Arsitektur Data dan Fragmentasi Pengawasan BI-OJK: Evaluasi Koordinasi Keuangan Indonesia melalui Lensa Maqashid Syariah

Authors

  • Slamet Santoso UIN Sunan Gunung Djati
  • Yadi Janwari UIN Sunan Gunung Djati
  • Sofian Al-Hakim UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32670/jim.v17i2.45

Abstract

The separation of supervisory mandates between Bank Indonesia (BI) and the Financial Services Authority (OJK) was designed to sharpen regulatory focus, yet it has introduced structural fragmentation in data flows that undermines the capacity for early risk detection. This study examines how data moves  and where it stalls  within the BI-OJK supervisory cycle, and asks whether the current architecture is genuinely capable of protecting public financial welfare or merely procedurally compliant. Drawing on qualitative-descriptive analysis of regulatory documents and institutional publications, the study maps the logic of data collection, verification, aggregation, risk modeling, and policy feedback across the two institutions. It then evaluates this logic against the normative framework of Maqashid Syariah  specifically the principles of hifzh al-mal (protection of systemic wealth), dar'u al-mafsadah (prevention of harm), and jalbu al-maslahah (advancement of public interest) to assess where technical design supports these goals and where it falls short. The findings suggest that identified gaps are not merely procedural inefficiencies but ethical failures in the stewardship of public financial stability. The study recommends standardizing real-time data protocols, strengthening AI-driven risk modeling governance, and formally embedding Maqashid-aligned principles within the KKSK coordination framework.

Keywords: Data Flow Logic, Macroprudential Supervision, Microprudential Supervision, Maqashid Syariah, Financial System Stability, BI-OJK Coordination.

References

Al-Shatibi, M. ibn A. (2005). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari’ah (Vol. 2). Dar al-Ma’rifah.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://iiit.org/en/book/maqasid-al-shariah-as-philosophy-of-islamic-law-a-systems-approach/

Borio, C. (2014). The financial cycle and macroeconomics: What have we learnt? Journal of Financial Stability, 10, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.07.004

Chapra, M. U. (2008a). The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of the Maqasid Al-Shari’ah. In Occasional Paper (Vol. 235). Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), Islamic Development Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/irtiop/0235.html

Chapra, M. U. (2008b). The Islamic welfare state and the role of the state. Islamic Research and Training Institute.

Claessens, S., & Kodres, U. (2017). The regulatory responses to the global financial crisis: Some unsettling questions. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475545623.001

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4 (ed.)). SAGE Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design-4-246896

Dusuki, A. W. (2008). Maqasid al-Shari’ah and its application in Islamic finance. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 1(1), 1–20.

Dusuki, A. W., & Bouheraoua, S. (2011). The framework of maqasid al-shari’ah and its implication for Islamic finance. International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance. https://www.isfin.net/sites/isfin.com/files/the_framework_of_maqas._id_al-shariah_and_its_implication_for_islamic_finance.pdf

Fitriyanti, F., & Setiorini, K. R. (2024). Legal Aspects of Digital Bank Risk Management. E3S Web of Conferences, 571. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457106003

Fund, I. M. (2021). Indonesia: Financial sector assessment program—Technical note on macroprudential policy framework. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR

Han, X., Mei, Y., Liu, J., Han, Z., & Han, L. (2025). A Novel Continuous Peephole LSTM with Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Timely Financial Risk Prediction. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN64981.2025.11228750

Hidayati, T., & Hidayatullah, M. S. (2021). Urgensi Fatwa DSN-MUI Mengenai Manajemen Risiko Pembiayaan Berbasis Syariah. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 15(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.4641

Indonesia, B. (2022). Laporan stabilitas sistem keuangan semester I 2022. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/stabilitas-keuangan/Pages/default.aspx

Indonesia, B. (2023). Laporan tahunan 2022: Transformasi dan ketahanan sistem keuangan Indonesia. Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan-tahunan/Pages/default.aspx

Jithendranathan, T. (2013). Financial market contagion. In Market Microstructure in Emerging and Developed Markets: Price Discovery, Information Flows, and Transaction Costs (pp. 115–134). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85217318665&partnerID=40&md5=a0f456c164b493eb51de48c19450dc4f

Keuangan, O. J. (2022). Laporan tahunan OJK 2021: Transformasi sektor jasa keuangan untuk mendukung pemulihan ekonomi nasional. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/data-dan-statistik/laporan-tahunan/Pages/Laporan-Tahunan-OJK-2021.aspx

Keuangan, O. J. (2023). Monograf riset stabilitas sistem keuangan 2021 (OJK-BI-LPS). Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/data-dan-statistik/research/prosiding/Pages/Monograf-Riset-Stabilitas-Sistem-Keuangan-2021-(OJK-BI-LPS).aspx

Madah Marzuki, M., Nik Abdul Majid, W. Z., Azis, N. K., Rosman, R., & Tumiran, S. D. (2025). Fraud risk management practice among listed companies in Malaysia: an Islamic perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2022-0347

Rubinfeld, D. (2024). Data portability and interoperability: An E.U.-U.S. comparison. European Journal of Law and Economics, 57(1–2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-023-09781-w

Settlements, B. for I. (2022). Annual economic report 2022: Data and technology in financial stability. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2022e.htm

Settlements, B. for I. (2023). AI and machine learning in prudential supervision. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap138.htm

Tiwari, S., Ramampiaro, H., & Langseth, H. (2021). Machine Learning in Financial Market Surveillance: A Survey. IEEE Access, 9, 159734–159754. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3130843

Wardhono, R. D. T. K., Simatupang, D. P. N., & Shalehanti, N. (2025). Legal Reforms in Indonesia’s Financial Sector on Institutional Relations between Bank Indonesia and the Government. Hasanuddin Law Review, 11(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v11i1.5438

Yadiati, W., Fitrijanti, T., & Sueb, M. (2022). The relationship between risk-taking and maqasid shariah-based performance in Islamic banks: Does shariah governance matter? Banks and Bank Systems, 17(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.21511/BBS.17(1).2022.12

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6 (ed.)). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13